Reviewer Guidelines: Ology Journals Guidelines
The primary function of Ology Journals is to present valuable scientific research information to scientists, scholars, students, and the public. In accordance with its goals, Ology Journals strives to provide the highest possible quality scientific research contents possible. To maintain its position as a global leader in the publication of scientific journals, Ology Press sets stringent reviewer guidelines as the industry standard for peer review.
The peer review system detailed in Ology Press guidelines provides a reliable and efficient system for evaluating the quality, relevance, and validity of scientific and scholarly research. Peer review provides authors with constructive feedback from relevant industry experts. Authors can use this feedback to improve their work, thereby ensuring the manuscript is of the highest standard possible.
Ology Journals Reviewer Guidelines
Ology Press holds its reviewers to the highest standards to ensure the best quality publications possible. Ology Journal reviewers are eminent persons in their fields and are highly respected by their peers. These reviewers provide genuine feedback and constructive criticism about the presented manuscripts. Editors rely on the educated comments provided by reviewers to make informed decisions about manuscripts.
The Peer Review Process
To perform a peer review, the reviewer should have special knowledge and expertise in the subject matter presented in the submitted document.
Articles published in Ology Press undergo a double-blind peer review process. During this process, reviewers can have complete access to the content of a document, but reviewers do not have access to the name, affiliations or details of the author.
In turn, the author of the document does not know the details of the reviewer. Reviewers may not reveal their identities. They may not contact authors without the express consent of the Ology Journal Editor. The double-blind nature of this peer review process helps ensure a fair review process.
Reviewers examine and process material in a time efficient manner. Ology Journal reviewers must employ review procedures required by Ology Journal. Reviewers are responsible for maintaining high review standards as set forth by Ology Journal.
The reviewers evaluate the originality, accuracy and completeness of each document, and provide honest feedback on the submitted work. While reviewers can present confidential feedback to Ology Journal editors, reviewers must maintain high ethical standards and avoid all forms of personal accusations in their reviews and feedback.
Reviewers do not edit contents presented in manuscripts. Instead, they provide constructive criticism intended to improve the quality of the document.
Reviewers ask a series of questions of the documents they review. Questions may include:
- Is the content original and important?
- Will it help readers? If so, how?
- Does the article add to existing knowledge?
- Does the piece read well and make sense?
- Does the document have a clear conclusion and compelling message?
Reviewers use additional criteria to evaluate research articles. In addition to originality, importance and relevance, material must be scientifically reliable. The document must clearly define and answer a research question through an appropriately and adequately designed study. The authors must adequately describe participants, methods, results, interpretations and conclusions, as well as supply references and supplemental documents.
All unpublished documents are confidential. Ology Journal reviewers protect the confidentiality of all manuscripts under their review. Reviewers do not have the right to disclose any information presented in the manuscript to any party outside of the Ology Journal editorial and review boards.
To provide the finest publications possible to the scientific community, Ology Press provides complete support for their publishing reviewers. Ology Journal offers clear reviewer guidelines and reviewer policies that make it easy to provide a quick and accurate peer review of material submitted for publication. Joining as Reviewer for Ology Journal is easier than ever. For more information, contact Ology Journal.